Android, Chrome OS Relationship Confusing Everyone, Including Google

July 10, 2009

Computer Renaissance has been buzzing with talk about the new Chrome OS. Here is some info on its relationship to the OTHER Google OS shipping on netbooks. Sounds like there is to many hands in the pot.

Just as companies were starting to get serious about installing Android, a mobile Linux OS, on netbooks, Google announces Chrome, a netbook Linux OS. The relationship between the two OSes is already getting tense, or at the very least, awkward.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt is now admitting that it took him quite a while to warm to the idea of Chrome the browser, even longer to come to terms with the possibility of Chrome the OS, and in both cases only after Larry Page Sergey Brin literally nerded him into submission:

I just gave up, but there is no question I am hugely supportive of Chrome and Chrome OS. They are game-changers. They change the way you think about your computer.

Meanwhile, Android’s perceived role in the world was expanding. After all this soul-searching, though, Schmidt must have a clear vision of parallel, non-conflicting roles for Android and Chrome OS, right?:

Although it appears they are two separate projects, there’s a great deal of commonality. Eventually they may merge even closer."

This is somewhere between "oops!" and "I have no idea."

But hold on! There could be a third way! Digitimes is reporting that Intel is in talks with Google to help adapt Android for use in MIDs, the so-far ill-fated bridge devices between netbooks and smartphones. Technologically, this seems like a reasonable secondary use for Android. Commercially, though, MIDs are something of a ghetto; a category broached by few manufacturers, and unfamiliar (or unattractive) to most customers.

The most obvious conclusion to all this is for Android (and Android enthusiasts) to narrow ambitions and focus on what we know it’s good at: cellphones, and possibly portable media players. This is something that will probably happen organically, but only after a few more news cycles worth of bewildering quotes and announcements from Google, which we will gleefully document.

source: http://gizmodo.com/5311682/android-chrome-os-relationship-confusing-everyone-including-google


Search engines for the music lover

July 9, 2009

 

We use search engines every day to find out all types of information such as news, sports, and research. Did you know that there are also search engines to help you find your favorite music? Computer Renaissance found this out:

If you have trouble finding music on the Web, you’ll be happy to know there are search engines designed specifically for finding your favorite tunes. They can help you stream everything from Top 40 hits to classics.

Find your music

MP3 Realm is a music search engine that helps you find MP3 tracks from across the Web. To do so, you’ll need to search the site for either an artist or a song. A results page will then give you the option of downloading the track or embedding the tune into your blog. You can also stream the song on your site. All of the songs MP3 Realm finds are hosted on servers across the Web, so download times do vary. It can be quick but can also make you endure a brutally long wait. MP3 Realm is a fine site, but it’s not the best music search engine in this roundup.

Mp3 Realm

Mp3 Realm has a fine selection, but download times vary widely.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

Project Playlist is one of the most convenient music search engines on the Web. Simply input an artist or track you like into the search engine and chances are that Project Playlist will have what you’re looking for. I searched for a variety of titles, including some that are obscure and, in every case, Project Playlist had at least one matching track.

After you find the track you’re looking for, you can stream it or add it to your playlist for future listening. If you can’t get enough of the song, you can have Project Playlist send it to you as a ringtone. That will take just a few seconds. Overall, Project Playlist is a stellar music search engine.

Project Playlist

Project Playlist has a great search engine.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

SkreemR won’t blow you away with its design. In fact, it’s an ugly site. But finding songs you might want to listen to is quite easy. It doesn’t offer as many songs as a site like Project Playlist, but I was generally pleased with the selection. SkreemR also features the option to create a ringtone from the song and to share your favorite tunes with your Twitter followers. Both features add some more value, but I had a hard time getting over SkreemR’s poor design.

SkreemR

SkreemR is just plain ugly.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

Songza allows you to search for artists or songs. It returns several results. When you hover your mouse over those results, you have the option of streaming the track, sharing it with your Twitter and Facebook friends, adding it to a playlist, or rating it. Playing a song takes just a few seconds. The site’s playlist feature is outstanding. And thanks to the YouTube window to the right of the search results, you can watch songs being performed. Songza is a neat site. Check it out.

Songza

Songza lets you listen to songs and watch videos.

(Credit: Screenshot by Don Reisinger/CNET)

My top 2

1. Project Playlist: Whether you’re looking for popular or obscure music, you’ll like Project Playlist’s convenient, thorough search engine.

2. Songza: Songza’s playlists make it worth checking out.

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10281031-2.html?tag=newsLatestHeadlinesArea.0


Nielsen: Kids’ online time leaps dramatically

July 8, 2009

 

Younger kids are using the internet more and more lately, spending an average of 11 hours a month in May 2009 when they only spend 7 hours in May 2004. Computer Renaissance thinks you may find this article interesting:

Kids from two to 11 years of age are spending 63 percent more time online than they did five years ago, says a report released Monday from Nielsen Online. Children in that age range were online an average of 11 hours in May 2009 versus just 7 hours in May 2004.

Over the past five years, the total number of kids surfing the Net has shot up 18 percent to 16 million, says the report, while the overall Internet population has risen only 10 percent. The younger set now represents 9.5 percent of the online community.

Online use among kids surged despite a projected decrease of 1 percent in the population of children under 14 for 2004 to 2010, says Nielsen, citing an estimate from the U.S. Census Bureau.

Results were split pretty evenly by gender. For May 2009, boys 2-11 spent 7 percent more time online than did girls in the same age group, though girls surfed 9 percent more web pages than did boys.

Online video has proven popular among kids, especially boys. Among all children, boys watched 61 percent of videos on the Net in May 2009, accounting for 57 percent of the time the children spent viewing online video.

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10797_3-10281882-235.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0


Chrome’s new-tab page gets more interactive

July 7, 2009

 

Computer Renaissance read that Chrome has updated their tab-pages to help make your browsing experience better. Read the details below:

Opening a new tab in a browser is a moment ripe with opportunity, and Google has begun testing a version of Chrome that can present new options when users do so.

Chrome’s current new-tab interface, which also shows by default when the browser is first launched, displays a three-by-three array of thumbnails of the most commonly visited Web sites. It also sports a history search box, a list of recent bookmarks, and a list of recently closed tabs. That changes in Chrome 3.0.191.3, a developer preview version released Monday.

The new layout, though, features a thumbnail grid four wide and two down, placing lists of closed tabs and recent downloads in a "recent activities" section below and offering an area for "tips and suggestions" next to it. This instructional section probably makes sense, given that Chrome is somewhat alien to most users, but so far it doesn’t show any actual tips or suggestions.

Also new is the ability to delete specific thumbnails with a close box, pin them so they’re permanently shown, and reorder them using a drag-and-drop interface. Chrome users also can opt to show Web pages in as a list rather than as thumbnails, and they can hide either the "recent activities" or "tips and suggestions" boxes.

The new-tab page historically has been left empty, but now browser makers see it as prime real estate for prompting users with ideas for what they might want to do or offering them what they might need.

Apple’s Safari 4 offers a 3D array of thumbnails, which debuted the pinning, deleting, and reordering features with its January beta debut. Mozilla developers also have been toying with Firefox’s new-tab behavior. Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 8 asks "What do you want to do next?" and offering choices such as enabling InPrivate browsing, reopening closed tabs, and installing accelerators that let people take actions with Web page text.

The new new-tab view isn’t available by default in Chrome. To use it, launch Chrome with the "–new-new-tab-page" command-line option.

The new version also fixes some issues with printing on Windows and with animated GIFs, according to Chrome Engineering Program Manager Jonathan Conradt.

 

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10281129-2.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0


10 Ways to Clean Your Keyboard

July 6, 2009

Getting all the dirt and grime out from the inside of your keyboard can be a grueling task. Computer Renaissance found an interesting article that provides 10 ways to de-grossify your keyboard. Read more below…

1. Use an air compressor

Get rid of the mysterious sticky stuff under your keyboard with compressed air equipped with an extension nozzle. Turn the can at a 45-degree angle and spray between the keys. Tap and shake the keyboard and then repeat spraying. Finish by cleaning the piled up grime with a damp cloth.

2. Use isopropyl alcohol

It’s easy to use isopropyl alcohol (never ethyl alcohol because you might remove the printed letters/numbers) with a damp cloth and Q-tips to remove the built up dirt. Always use a cloth rather than applying the alcohol directly to the keys.

3. Use a USB vacuum cleaner

USB vacuum cleaners to do the hard part of sucking up potato chip and pretzel debris. Just plug into your USB port and use the thin keyboard tool to make your keyboard look like new again. Also includes a built in LED light.

4. Use CyberClean

CyberClean makes cleaning fun! Just take the yellow gel blob that looks like Play-Doh and press it over the keys to lift out dirt and bacteria. The patented sticky formula from Switzerland even kills germs on contact. It’s also good on cell phones and any other potentially infectious surface.

5. Remove all of the keys

This tip is for folks with a lot of patience. First make a copy of your keyboard layout and turn your computer/keyboard off. Next, remove the keys with a screwdriver. Clean out what’s underneath the keys and then clean each key with a damp cloth and Q-tip.

6. Clorox Wipes or household disinfectants

If you eat at your keyboard or type with dirty hands or if multiple people use your keyboard, you need to protect yourself daily with Clorox or a disinfectant spray (on a cloth) to control the germ invasion.

7. Use the dishwasher

Yes, it does sound extreme, but it works if you want to save time and don’t need your keyboard for a few days. Wash the keyboard using only water and remember to remove all of keys. Then let it dry out for two or three days.

8. Use Post-it Notes

If there’s an ample supply of Post-it Notes around, they’ll come in handy when you want to clean your crumb-filled keyboard fast. Just turn the sticky edge of the Post-it towards the hard-to-remove specks and voila!

9. Use a hairdryer

Using a hairdryer is great for general dusting and debris-clearing. It also saves time. Just point it at the keyboard and go with the heat on or off. Can be used with or without the compressed air can.

10. Use Scotch Tape

Using Scotch Tape or another brand of transparent tape can help you quickly remove dirt and crumbs. First give the keyboard a good shake and then start applying the tape.

Source: http://www.inc.com/ss/how-clean-your-keyboard?slide=0#1


Is Twitter freaking out over ‘tweet’ trademark?

July 1, 2009

 

Computer Renaissance read that Twitter is not happy with the use of the word “tweet” being used with other companies. Tweet is a word that has been in the dictionary for centuries. Should Twitter be upset? Read the story below:

Is Twitter getting possessive of its own name? Maybe.

A developer building an application using Twitter’s API was told via e-mail that Twitter took issue with the user interface of his application, allegedly very similar to Twitter’s own, as well as his use of the word "tweet" in the application’s name.

The developer forwarded the e-mail to TechCrunch: "Twitter, Inc., is uncomfortable with the use of the word Tweet (our trademark) and the similarity in your UI and our own."

Uh-oh. If Twitter is staking a claim to the word "tweet," that could mean a problem for TweetDeck, TweetMeme, PoliTweets, and some of the other extremely popular businesses built atop Twitter.

A few things to keep in mind here. One, the developer was also creating a service that looked a lot like Twitter, the TechCrunch post explains, which means that the use of the word "tweet" may really have been less important than the e-mail made it out to be. Second, it’s a personal e-mail coming from a Twitter employee–not a company representative or executive–which means that it may not be perfectly aligned with the company’s official stance on things.

(Case in point: A Twitter investor hinted to The New York Times that the company would be making money with virtual coupons. One of Twitter’s co-founders said in a comment on a blog that the investor was "brainstorming on his own.")

But the tech industry does have a history of getting into one skirmish after another over names similar to their trademarks. Several years ago, Apple started sending cease-and-desist letters to some third-party equipment companies and fan blogs that were using the word "pod" in their names. Google, too, has taken issue with the word "googling" being used as a generic verb.

And as TechCrunch points out, Twitter has filed for a trademark on the word "tweet." On the other hand, being possessive of this term (which, it goes without saying, has been a dictionary word for centuries) might not be the smartest strategy, if Twitter indeed wants to be a Digital Age communication standard "like electricity," as one executive said last month. So we’ll see how this one unfolds.

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10276853-36.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0


Yahoo enables twittering via Flickr

June 30, 2009

 

A lot of people have twitter and a lot of people have photos. Yahoo’s Flickr is bringing the two together. Computer Renaissance thinks that you may find this helpful the next time you want to “tweet” a picture to someone.

Yahoo has released a feature that lets people post Flickr photos to their Twitter accounts.

The Twitter2Flickr feature requires that you enable Flickr as an approved application that can tweet under your username.

Then, when you click the "blog this" link above a photo at Flickr, you’re presented with the option to twitter it. The tweet will come with a "flic.kr" shortened URL.

Flickr has a large number of users, and its use is amplified by the fact that other sites can make use of Flickr data through an API (application programming interface). The Twitter integration is a modest example of Yahoo’s attempt to make its sites less of a walled garden by working better with other Web properties.

A Twitter search for Flickr photographs indicates that a lot of people are making use of the integration, which had been in beta testing since earlier in June.

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10276236-2.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0


Bait and switch: Online electronics stores caught in fraud

June 29, 2009

Computer Renaissance always warns our customers to make sure they know what type of company they are dealing when when shopping online. Read below to see how several online businesses based in Brooklyn are accused of fraud:

Seven online merchants operating more than 40 Web sites have agreed to pay a $765,000 settlement following an investigation by the New York State Attorney General’s office, the AG’s office said.

"These companies engaged in the worst kinds of consumer fraud, from classic bait-and-switch schemes to blatant lies and bullying sales tactics," New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said in a news release that went out Thursday. "Let this be a message to online merchants everywhere: such abuse of consumers and violation of the law will not be tolerated."

All of the companies were based in Brooklyn, and while their names invoke digital photography, many also sell gear ranging from projectors to HDTVs and computers.

Five of the companies–Best Price Camera, Foto Connection, 1 Way Photo, 86th Street Photo, and Broadway Photo–agreed to change their business practices, according to the release, while the other two–Camera Wiz and Sonic Photo–will close. A full list (PDF) of the companies and Web sites involved in the settlement is available at HDGuru.com.

In the bait-and-switch routine employed by these merchants, the bait is prices that are significantly lower than those of other merchants. The switch occurs after the customer places the order, according to the AG’s news release:

Once an order was placed, the companies would call consumers and try to sell them additional or "upgraded" merchandise at inflated prices. If the consumer refused to purchase the additional merchandise, the companies would cancel the sale or claim the item was backordered for months. If the consumer did agree to purchase the additional merchandise, the companies would send them lower-quality merchandise than what was promised, or merchandise that the consumer never ordered in the first place. When customers tried to return the items, they would either be denied or be slammed with undisclosed fees. All of the companies further limited customers’ ability to return merchandise by requiring them to speak to a live customer representative during limited business hours, and then refusing to answer those telephone calls.

If you bought an item from one of the named retailers and believe you qualify for restitution, you can submit a claim to the New York State Better Business Bureau from July through December.

 

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10274730-1.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0


Apple sued over iTunes gift cards

June 26, 2009

Computer Renaissance read that Apple is being sued over their iTunes gift cards.  A couple from Illinois claim that the gift cards were advertised as allowing you to purchase songs for 99 cents. When they went online they saw that the some songs cost as much as $1.29 each. They are suing for “fraud”. See the story below:

Illinois residents Daniel and Barbara Owens are suing Apple, accusing the company of fraud related to its iTunes gift cards.

The suit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in southern Illinois and obtained by CNET, shows that the couple is seeking monetary damages for Apple’s "wrongful, illegal, improper and fraudulent acts."

The Owens claim that Apple markets the gift cards as selling individual songs on iTunes for 99 cents each. The couple argues that not all songs in the iTunes Store are that cheap–some actually cost $1.29. They contend that they have been "denied the benefit of their bargain to purchase any song" from iTunes for 99 cents.

In April, Apple changed the pricing structure of the iTunes Store from 99 cents per song to a variable model in which songs cost 69 cents, 99 cents, or $1.29. The Owens say they purchased several iTunes cards including two $25 cards on March 1, 2008, from Sam’s Club and a $15 card on May 19, 2009, from Wal-Mart.

Apple has expanded its presence in many retail outlets over the years, allowing stores like Target, Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Walgreens, and others to sell gift cards.

The company is being sued on four counts including two counts of breach of contract, one count of violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, and one count of violating the Consumer Protection Statutes.

Apple could not immediately be reached for comment.

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10273669-37.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0


Generation Y: We’re just not that into Twitter

June 23, 2009

 

There are so many social networking sites today and many people have more then one account. Computer Renaissance read that Generation Y just is not that in to Twitter for some reason. Read below and see why the Twitter service may not fit in completely with Generation Y’s needs.

Given that Generation Y is often pegged as narcissistic, lazy, having high expectations, craving the limelight, and other such flattering characterizations, one might expect we’d be Twittering as if it were breathing. After all, Twitter is known as a place where people expose the most minute details of their lives–missing the bus, stubbing a toe, toasting an English muffin.

But a recent survey from Pace University and the Participatory Media Network shows that only 22 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds use Twitter, while 99 percent have profiles on social networks.

This may seem surprising on the face of it, but as a member of the Millennial Generation myself, I have some theories as to why it might be true. To see why we’re not into Twitter, I’ll have to revisit the start of the social-networking timeline: MySpace.

We Gen Yers spent hours on MySpace customizing our profiles and making them perfect representations of us (or rather, who we wanted to be). We couldn’t wait for our friends to comment a new photo: "New pic, please comment!" MySpace made many of us feel popular, or even famous. I remember posting a new profile picture and refreshing the page in anticipation of responses.

Jean Twenge, psychologist and author of "The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement," calls this phenomenon "self-branding." People use MySpace as a portal for creating their own personal brand, Twenge says, complete with photos, custom banners, gossip, and fans (friends). One of the most successful self-branders is Tila Tequila, who tactfully used MySpace to achieve status as one of the users with the most friends on the site, and later parlayed that fame into a career as an MTV reality star.

Though we weren’t international superstars, my friends and I were content on MySpace. But fast-forward a couple years to Facebook. It proved to be a difficult transition: where were all the flashing graphics, purple fonts, and exhaustive, multimedia-laden About Me sections? Why weren’t the number of photo comments shown? Every user’s profile looks the same, and at a glance, it seems self-branding is not easily attained.

The clean design of Facebook deemed decked-out profiles and artsy photos passe, but the site provided us with a new form of self-expression–"What are you doing?" status updates, which became the new platform for what Twenge describes as my generation’s narcissistic need for attention.

What Facebook intends as a forum for sharing, Gen Yers see as a game of show-off. A quick look at my news feed and I see "Melissa" (name changed to protect the innocent) is having "one of the funnest nights of her life," and "beer and vodka make a interesting combination oww." ‘Nuff said.

Brendon Nemeth, a 22-year-old San Franciscan whom I met this spring, says he updates his status to "keep family and friends informed on what’s going on that’s interesting in my life."

We no longer impress our friends with profiles that represent us through our creative flourishes, but rather with profiles that spell out what we’re doing. (Out of fairness, our status updates don’t always revolve around happenings at the local bar; plenty of us want to share our work promotions or volunteer activities, too.)

When Facebook implemented its news feed, users formed groups to oppose the feature. Now our status updates are lost in a flood of information, including quiz results, wall posts (not our own), and links. An update is posted, two minutes pass, and it’s nowhere to be seen. Some of us even resort to reposting our updates just so they grab the attention they deserve.

On her blog, Twenge suggests that the kids of Gen Y aren’t interested in their community, they are interested in themselves: "Younger generations are more individualistic and are higher in self-esteem and narcissism. There have been no changes in ‘communal’ traits."

I’d have to agree. We do anticipate seeing our friends’ activities, but what we really look forward to is what they think of our activities–we want to be "cyberstalked," preferably in the form of replies to our self-published content. Nemeth says that "there are times when I update my status to induce a reaction." Reactions are what drive us to add photos, update our status, and write on our friends’ walls.

So where does Twitter fit in?
Twitter’s microblogging platform is what many Gen Y’s may describe as "like Facebook, but just the status update." What is the point of that? We like to consolidate, so Nemeth explains that he doesn’t "want to join another community, just tell people what (he’s) doing." We have everything we need on Facebook.

Based on Twenge’s theory, a good explanation of my generation’s lag in joining the Twitter mania is that there isn’t an obvious way to achieve a self-brand on Twitter.

Participating on Twitter requires a fan base that knows why you are unique, special, and deserve attention. Fan base aside, the Web site’s interface paves a short path for cyberstalking–there is nothing to find past a user’s status.

For example, Sally went to a great party last weekend, but where are the photos? Who went with her? These features, which Gen Y’s value so much, are missing.

As much as I like to know what my friends are doing, updates on Twitter happen so fast there really isn’t time to react. More importantly, my friends don’t have time to react to my activities.

Largely as a result of the digital communication tools on which we were raised, a big part of my generation wants to know what the cyberworld thinks of us, and we want its inhabitants to pay attention to us. How can they do this if they’re following 300 other people?

For the Millennials to make the move, Twitter will have to find a way to integrate the self-branding features MySpace gave birth to and Facebook nurtured. Even if they’re packaged in 140 characters or less.

Source: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10265060-2.html?tag=mncol